In a Grove :: essays research papers

Louis Andrei Zabala                                             Litera210335625                                               07/11/05In A GroveIt is a written report that provides the ultimate explanation of how two different people who atomic number 18 witnesses to a crime give completely different psychological recollections of the same event. The author reminds us that truth depends on the telling. Someone must step previous and tell that truth.I believe that no guinea pig how many times you read "In A Grove," theres not enough information in the story to figure out the truth just about what took place on the day of the samurais death, but its still fun to sort out what you think you know for sure, what seems passing probable, what seems highly improbable, and what doesnt fit into any of these three categories. But for me, "In A Grove" isnt about searching for some kind of absolute truth its about how differently people perceive the same external event. The best example in the story of what I mean by this is perhaps the sword grapple between the bandit and the samurai. The bandit perceived it as a heroic duel between a pair of honorable, expert swordsmen while the woodsman power saw two scared, clumsy men stumbling around with swords in their hands as each tried desperately to prevail over the other any means he could. When its all said and done, you wont know who is telling the truth, who is lying and, most importantly, why.Yet the parable is more important, today, perhaps, as a lesson in how we construct the narratives upon which legal expert depends What facts must we know to decide the truth? That question makes the authors inquiry the concern of those who now seek justice in the GMA presidency, as well.And it doesnt matter one bit. The writer isnt interested in truth, lies or anything of the sort. Hes interested in reality, and the reality of human truth is that no one will ever unfeignedly know it.